|
Writing Instruction Using Growth Mindset Training and Process-Genre Approach to Enhance Academic Writing Abilities of Upper Secondary Students |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Pannawat Nutan |
| Title | Writing Instruction Using Growth Mindset Training and Process-Genre Approach to Enhance Academic Writing Abilities of Upper Secondary Students |
| Contributor | Wipawan Wongsuwan Kongpao |
| Publisher | Centre for Education Innovation, Print and Online Media |
| Publication Year | 2569 |
| Journal Title | An Online Journal of Education (OJED) |
| Journal Vol. | 21 |
| Journal No. | 1 |
| Page no. | 1-19 |
| Keyword | growth mindset, process-genre approach, academic writing ability, upper secondary students |
| URL Website | https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/OJED |
| Website title | An Online Journal of Education (OJED) |
| ISSN | 1905-4491 (Online) |
| Abstract | The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare the academic writing ability of an experimental group before and after using the combination of growth mindset training and process-genre approach, and 2) to compare the post-instruction academic writing ability between the experimental and control groups. The participants were 60 12th-grade students, selected through multistage random sampling and equally divided into an experimental group and a control group of 30 students each. The research instruments included: 1) three lesson plan units with an index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) of 0.92, 2) an academic writing ability test using an analytic scoring rubric, having an IOC of 0.94 and a Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of 0.95, and 3) a post-writing reflection form with an IOC of 0.70. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired-samples t-test to compare the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group, and independent t-test to compare the post-test scores between the experimental and control groups. Qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. The quantitative findings revealed that: 1) the mean post-test score of the experimental group was significantly higher than its pre-test score at the .01 level (M = 89.73, SD = 7.89), and 2) the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on the post-test at the .01 level of significance (M = 89.73, SD = 7.89). |
