|
Comparison of Plant Propagation Portions and the Effectiveness of Azollawith Chemical Fertilizer on the Growth of Episcia cupreata |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Wanwisa Inkaewpuangkham |
| Title | Comparison of Plant Propagation Portions and the Effectiveness of Azollawith Chemical Fertilizer on the Growth of Episcia cupreata |
| Contributor | Suwanan Wanathamjaroen, Kullawich Panichkul, Nateetip Sawatraksa, NatthaamornChuangcherm, Taveesin Panyasi, Manoch Kumpanalaisatit |
| Publisher | Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Thailand |
| Publication Year | 2569 |
| Journal Title | Journal of Science and Agricultural Technology |
| Journal Vol. | 7 |
| Journal No. | 1 |
| Page no. | 35-43 |
| Keyword | Flame Violet, Azolla, osmocote, chemical fertilizer, biofertilizer |
| URL Website | https://jsat.rmutl.ac.th/ |
| Website title | Journal of Science and Agricultural Technology |
| ISSN | 27301524 |
| Abstract | This research aimed to compare plant propagation portions and the efficiency of Azolla on growth anddevelopment of Episcia cupreata. This research was conducted using a factorial design in a CRD with of 2 factors:1) plant propagation portions: mother plant and stolon, 2) nutrient source: Osmocote (chemical fertilizer; 13-13-13)ratio 6 g per plant, dried Azolla (biofertilizer) at 30 g per 1 kg of medium; Osmocote 6 g and dried Azolla 30 g),and no-fertilizer (control treatment). The results showed that both plant propagation portions, the mother plant andthe stolon, were not significantly different in canopy width, plant height, number of leaves per plant, number ofstolons per plant, number of flowers per plant, flower width, and tube length. This indicated that both plantpropagation portions can use as plant propagation material. Factor of nutrients source, it was found that theOsmocote affected canopy width (33.37 cm), plant height (6.50 cm), number of leave per plant (87.0 leaves), numberof stolons per plant (16.17 stolon), number of flowers per plant (5.25 flowers), flower width (1.93 cm), and tubelength (2.34 cm) which is significantly greater than the other treatments. However, this treatment was notsignificantly different from canopy width, number of leaves per plant, flower width, and tube length when comparedto the treatment that use Osmocote + Azolla. The interaction between two factors, stolon with Osmocote treatmentor stolon with Osmocote + Azolla that affected canopy width, number of leaves per plant, number of stolons perplant, flower width, and tube length better than other treatments. Further studies is recommended to optimize theratio of Azolla combined with Osmocote fertilizer in order to reduce the use of chemical fertilizer in Episciacupreata production in the future. |
