|
Analysis of Communication in Participatory Local Development Planning |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Nongnuch Lertduailap |
| Title | Analysis of Communication in Participatory Local Development Planning |
| Contributor | Wittayatorn Tokeaw, Haruthai Panyawuttrakul |
| Publisher | Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Kalasin University |
| Publication Year | 2569 |
| Journal Title | Governance Journal, Kalasin University |
| Journal Vol. | 15 |
| Journal No. | 1 |
| Page no. | 195-208 |
| Keyword | Communication for Development, Citizen Participation, Local Development Planning, Participatory Communication |
| URL Website | https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/gjournal-ksu |
| Website title | Governance Journal, Kalasin University |
| ISSN | ISSN: 3027-8589 (Online) |
| Abstract | This academic article to explain “Analysis of Communication in Participatory Local Development Planning” within the context of Thailand’s decentralization and local governance reforms. It argues that citizen participation in local planning does not occur automatically but must be deliberately cultivated through well-designed, well-managed communication processes that are transparent, dialogical, and inclusive of all stakeholders. The author reviews literature, concepts, theories, and research related to the role of communication and public participation in developing development plans. The paper first discusses the importance of communication in local development planning by linking it with Thailand’s Ministry of Interior regulations, which mandate community forums and popular participation as key mechanisms for formulating local development plans. Second, the paper outlines a stepwise communication management process throughout the planning cycle-pre-planning preparation and stakeholder analysis, information dissemination, participatory needs assessment, priority setting, plan formulation, and feedback and monitoring-drawing on UN-Habitat and international guidelines for participatory local development planning. Third, the article integrates several theoretical perspectives. Arnstein’s “ladder of citizen participation” is used to conceptualize different levels of participation from tokenism to citizen control. Servaes’ and Freire’s notions of participatory and dialogical communication are applied to argue that genuine participation requires two-way communication, horizontal dialogue, and co-creation of meaning. Grunig and Hunt’s excellence theory in public relations is employed to highlight the role of symmetrical two-way communication and relationship building between local governments and citizens. The article also refers to empirical research in Thailand on communication for citizen participation and women’s participation in local development, which shows that combining formal channels (public hearings, committees) with informal ones (social networks, online groups) can significantly enhance participation. Finally, the paper proposes key communication principles for participatory local planning: transparency, accessibility, equity, cultural sensitivity, clarity of language, multi-channel strategies and trust-building. Identifies critical success factors such as communicative leadership, social capital, institutionalized participatory mechanisms, the communication capacity of personnel and communication ethics. These are all conditions that make local development plans legitimate, respond to problems, and lead to sustainable development. |
