|
SYMBOLIC DECENTRALIZATION: LOCAL GOVERNMENT CHALLENGES IN PM2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE WITHIN INDUSTRIALIZING THAILAND |
|---|---|
| รหัสดีโอไอ | |
| Creator | Chayaporn CHATURAPORNPRACIT |
| Title | SYMBOLIC DECENTRALIZATION: LOCAL GOVERNMENT CHALLENGES IN PM2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE WITHIN INDUSTRIALIZING THAILAND |
| Contributor | Punchada SIRIVUNNABOOD |
| Publisher | Asian Political Science Review |
| Publication Year | 2569 |
| Journal Title | Asian Political Science Review |
| Journal Vol. | 10 |
| Journal No. | 1 |
| Page no. | Article 10 |
| Keyword | Symbolic Decentralization, Environmental Governance, PM2.5 Pollution, Green Criminology, Regulatory Authority |
| URL Website | https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/APSR |
| Website title | https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/APSR/article/view/285939 |
| ISSN | 2730-3624 |
| Abstract | This article examines the structural complexities of environmental governance in rapidly industrializing regions by investigating PM2.5 pollution management within Thailand’s Eastern Economic Corridor. While decentralization reforms theoretically empower local authorities to address community concerns, this research explores the practical disconnect between localized environmental harm and highly centralized regulatory frameworks. Employing a rigorous qualitative methodology comprising documentary analysis, sixty-two in-depth interviews, and three focus groups, the study engages diverse stakeholders across multiple governance levels. Drawing on green criminology and interpretive policy analysis, the empirical findings show that local governments serve primarily as frontline responders but lack the legal authority and institutional capacity to regulate major industrial polluters directly. This profound mismatch creates a governance condition conceptualized as "symbolic decentralization," in which heavy administrative burdens are routinely devolved without transferring substantive regulatory power. Consequently, fragmented responsibilities, delayed interventions, and weak deterrence mechanisms persist, inadvertently normalizing environmental harm within affected communities. Ultimately, the study argues that effectively mitigating PM2.5 pollution goes beyond technical solutions and requires comprehensive institutional reforms that align regulatory authority with the spatial distribution of environmental risks. |
