A Qualitative Inquiry into the Role and Dynamics of Financial Risk Management in Crisis: Experiences from Corporate Debt Restructuring
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research findings reveal three key themes that challenge traditional theories: (1) "From the textbook to cash is king," demonstrating the shift from structural risk management to preserving cash flow for survival; (2) "CFO as a firefighter," revealing a new role where behavioral and interpersonal skills are more important than technical financial skills; and (3) "Putting all cards on the table," a strategy of extreme transparency to build trust with creditors alongside operational restructuring. The research findings expand on Altman et al.'s (2019) integrated risk management framework by adding the dimension of managerial behavioral capabilities, challenging Hull's (2023) view of CFOs as strategists, and expanding Gilson et al.'s (1990) theory, demonstrating that transparency is a continuous variable positively correlated with the chances of surviving a crisis. This research illustrates a paradigm shift in risk management from a preventive approach to a "science of survival" that emphasizes cash flow, trust, and behavioral adaptation. This has significant implications for developing risk management curricula, enhancing the competencies of financial managers, and establishing transparency mechanisms between debtors and creditors.
Article history: Received 13 August 2025
Revised 11 November 2025
Accepted 14 November 2025
SIMILARITY INDEX = 0.74 %
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The views and opinions of the article appearing in this journal are those of the author. It is not considered a view and responsibility of the editorial staff.
References
Altman, E. I., Hotchkiss, E., & Wang, W. (2019). Corporate financial distress, restructuring, and bankruptcy: Analyze leveraged finance, distressed debt, and bankruptcy (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Bank of Thailand. (2017). Early warning systems for financial crisis prevention. Bank of Thailand.
Financial Stability Board. (2022). FSB annual report 2022. Financial Stability Board.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
Gilson, S. C., John, K., & Lang, L. H. P. (1990). Troubled debt restructurings: An empirical study of private reorganization of firms in default. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 315–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90032-I
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hull, J. C. (2023). Risk management and financial institutions (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
International Monetary Fund. (2021). World economic outlook: Managing divergent recoveries. International Monetary Fund.
Jorion, P. (2007). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Lauridsen, L. S. (1998). The financial crisis in Thailand: Causes, conduct and consequences? World Development, 26(8), 1575–1591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00038-3
Mahadewi, L. (2022). Qualitative paradigm of risk management. In Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Management Research Conference (APMRC 2022) (pp. 456–465). Atlantis Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220701.087
McKibbin, W., & Fernando, R. (2021). The global macroeconomic impacts of COVID-19: Seven scenarios. Asian Economic Papers, 20(2), 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00796
Stulz, R. M. (2008). Risk management failures: What are they and when do they happen? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20(4), 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2008.00202.x
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House.
Warr, P. (Ed.). (2004). Thailand beyond the crisis. Routledge.